|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Faylee Freir
Facetious Indifference
Vendetta Mercenary Group
252
   |
Posted - 2016.08.16 02:51:06 -
[1] - Quote
Origo Lim wrote:I feel inspired by the deeds of Kusion family.
I like the idea of solo ganking a Skiff; with multiple characters, of course.
Lets say, six bombers.
One with a scram, five with target painters.
Will need to run the math to figure out the exact number of TPs needed tho...
Six bombers will be able to kill any skiff in 0.5 system (provided that you use correct damage type).
Will this work ?
You should probably drop corp.
HTFU
|
Faylee Freir
Facetious Indifference
Vendetta Mercenary Group
252
|
Posted - 2016.08.16 11:41:04 -
[2] - Quote
Origo Lim wrote:I feel inspired by the deeds of Kusion family.
I like the idea of solo ganking a Skiff; with multiple characters, of course.
Lets say, six bombers.
One with a scram, five with target painters.
Will need to run the math to figure out the exact number of TPs needed tho...
Six bombers will be able to kill any skiff in 0.5 system (provided that you use correct damage type).
Will this work ?
Last time I was in TCE i was told that all the plebs were in NOL. Surprised to see someone from TCE in the crime and punishment sub-forum asking for help in theorycrafting a gank.
The Kusion family inspires you to multibox gank and the best you come up with is skiffs? 
HTFU
|
Faylee Freir
Facetious Indifference
Vendetta Mercenary Group
254
|
Posted - 2016.08.16 13:00:54 -
[3] - Quote
Dom Arkaral wrote:Faylee Freir wrote:Origo Lim wrote:I feel inspired by the deeds of Kusion family.
I like the idea of solo ganking a Skiff; with multiple characters, of course.
Lets say, six bombers.
One with a scram, five with target painters.
Will need to run the math to figure out the exact number of TPs needed tho...
Six bombers will be able to kill any skiff in 0.5 system (provided that you use correct damage type).
Will this work ? Last time I was in TCE i was told that all the plebs were in NOL. Surprised to see someone from TCE in the crime and punishment sub-forum asking for help in theorycrafting a gank. The Kusion family inspires you to multibox gank and the best you come up with is skiffs? And how long were you in TCE? :P
Not long, moved on to war decs. Loyal asked me to join TCE because boney and warr were whining about how me and my friends were killing a significant amount of freighter traffic coming out of Jita.
HTFU
|
Faylee Freir
Facetious Indifference
Vendetta Mercenary Group
258
|
Posted - 2016.08.16 17:09:24 -
[4] - Quote
Dom Arkaral wrote:Faylee Freir wrote:Dom Arkaral wrote:Faylee Freir wrote:Origo Lim wrote:I feel inspired by the deeds of Kusion family.
I like the idea of solo ganking a Skiff; with multiple characters, of course.
Lets say, six bombers.
One with a scram, five with target painters.
Will need to run the math to figure out the exact number of TPs needed tho...
Six bombers will be able to kill any skiff in 0.5 system (provided that you use correct damage type).
Will this work ? Last time I was in TCE i was told that all the plebs were in NOL. Surprised to see someone from TCE in the crime and punishment sub-forum asking for help in theorycrafting a gank. The Kusion family inspires you to multibox gank and the best you come up with is skiffs? And how long were you in TCE? :P Not long, moved on to war decs. Loyal asked me to join TCE because boney and warr were whining about how me and my friends were killing a significant amount of freighter traffic coming out of Jita. TCE was 95% freighter ganks while NOL was 95% everything else. I miss those times tbh (had an alt in TCE) Learned a lot on what to do to get ganked hahah The "4 freighters an hour" era :D
Loyal was definitely talented and brought tons of content to a bynch of people. RIP
HTFU
|
Faylee Freir
Facetious Indifference
Vendetta Mercenary Group
259
|
Posted - 2016.08.16 19:49:10 -
[5] - Quote
The absolute fact is that Loyal was a good FC. He provided top notch entertainment to those around him.
Another absolute fact is that ganking victims and those in the AG community both tossed out more real life threats to not only Loyal, but to anyone involved. Yeah what Loyal did was in bad taste but why paint him red when hes been a victim just as much if not more than what hes dished out. The difference is that Loyal and most content creators dont play the victim card and shrug it off as some idiotic pleb with cheeto stains on his keyboard, where you find that someone is witch hunted and put in center stage when they step out of line briefly.
I understand that MANY people hated Loyal, but his comments that got him banned are equal to any real life threat made upon him. Wheres the balance?
So lay off the moral high horse and look at it for what it really is. Behind a player that got banned for comments made, he was an ojtstanding player and a great fc.. I wasnt that close to him but he did more for me personally than anyone had done previously.
HTFU
|
Faylee Freir
Facetious Indifference
Vendetta Mercenary Group
262
|
Posted - 2016.08.16 21:29:33 -
[6] - Quote
Nitshe Razvedka wrote:Who in the Anti-Ganking community "tossed out real life threats"?
The AG channels are tightly moderated. I have NEVER heard an active AG ever give a RL threat in local either.
I call BS.
Dont worry its not bs. Talk to any content creator and im sure they can share stories and tears.. Some filled with fits of rage that contain real life threats or inappropriate insults.
Ive personally seen plenty of toxic behavior out of both AG and the prominant ganking groups and even extends to both "deviant" content creators and plain old victims.
Just hypocritical that it seems like only those that are involved in emergent content get punished... And publicly hazed. If someone posted every edgy or inapproprite comment made to a carebear or victim there would be public outcry for banning. Flip that situation over where the ganker is the recipiant and everyone would say, "well its okay because they drove him to make those comments".
Its 2016 people. If men can be women and vise versa, then i say we get fair treatment for all when handing down punishments and bans.
HTFU
|
Faylee Freir
Facetious Indifference
Vendetta Mercenary Group
262
|
Posted - 2016.08.16 21:42:36 -
[7] - Quote
Nitshe Razvedka wrote:Faylee Freir wrote:Nitshe Razvedka wrote:Who in the Anti-Ganking community "tossed out real life threats"?
The AG channels are tightly moderated. I have NEVER heard an active AG ever give a RL threat in local either.
I call BS. Dont worry its not bs. Talk to any content creator and im sure they can share stories and tears.. Some filled with fits of rage that contain real life threats or inappropriate insults. Ive personally seen plenty of toxic behavior out of both AG and the prominant ganking groups and even extends to both "deviant" content creators and plain old victims. Just hypocritical that it seems like only those that are involved in emergent content get punished... And publicly hazed. If someone posted every edgy or inapproprite comment made to a carebear or victim there would be public outcry for banning. Flip that situation over where the ganker is the recipiant and everyone would say, "well its okay because they drove him to make those comments". Its 2016 people. If men can be women and vise versa, then i say we get fair treatment for all when handing down punishments and bans. You said RL threats, are you now adjusting that to toxic behaviour. Big difference. Police get called in for RL threats.
Im equating them in the fact that according to CCP they are both not allowed. Thats the thing.. Content creators and deviants get rl threats all the time and shrug it off.
HTFU
|
Faylee Freir
Facetious Indifference
Vendetta Mercenary Group
262
|
Posted - 2016.08.16 21:44:36 -
[8] - Quote
Nitshe Razvedka wrote:Dirty Forum Alt wrote:Loyal's comments were different than RL threats - he took an RL tragedy that had *already actually happened* and spammed it and used it to insult/hurt people. He deserved his ban.
However Nitshe - I've seen anti-gankers throwing out real-life threats in local - and I'm not even a ganker. They really are pretty common from all non-PvP-oriented players when PvP is thrust upon them. If you want proof - go blink yellow for a couple of days on the undock of any mission hub station. You don't even have to shoot at anybody - if they shoot you just go ahead and dock up. I can pretty much 100% guarantee you that you will have real-life oriented insults and threats thrown at you - because that is just the way people get these days...So just imagine what CODE. gankers who actually go out of their way to make people explode have hurled at them...
Not saying it excuses Loyal's actions - as I say it isn't even related, they are entirely different types of crossing the line. But I still 100% guarantee you that it does happen. Give me some names of active Anti-Gankers, not minor or freighter pilots. Anti-Gankers.
I cant procure any names because i could care less about rl threats from a pitiful online idiot. I dont generally save or screenshot those convos alrough i might have some in mails. I generally take these comments or insults as a comment card saying how well i did my job. Im sure someone here has a Dexter's bloodslide box filled with great insults and rl threats.
HTFU
|
|
|
| |
|